Victor Mancini, a medical-school dropout, is an antihero for our deranged times. Needing to pay elder care for his mother, Victor has devised an ingenious scam: he pretends to choke on pieces of food while dining in upscale restaurants. He then allows himself to be "saved" by fellow patrons who, feeling responsible for Victor's life, go on to send checks to support him. When he's not pulling this stunt, Victor cruises sexual addiction recovery workshops for action, visits his addled mom, and spends his days working at a colonial theme park. His creator, Chuck Palahniuk, is the visionary we need and the satirist we deserve.
eMusic Review 0
Palahniuk keeps the ugly, but adds the specificity that makes his twisted tale resonate
In Choke, the ugly details stack up like relentless Jenga blocks. Narrator and anti-hero Victor Mancini is a 24-year-old med-school dropout, aimless in the way many 24-year-olds are. But this 24-year-old med-school dropout happens to play an indentured servant for the minimum wage at a mock 18th century village called "Colonial Dunsboro." Victor's earnings go to support his institutionalized mother, who no longer recognizes the son she repeatedly abducted as a boy. Of course, said earnings aren't nearly enough; hence the scam that gives the book its title: Victor routinely fakes choking at restaurants — the good citizens who give him the Heimlich fancy themselves the boy's savior and can be counted on as financial benefactors for life. And, oh yes, Victor is a recovering sex addict. Or was: Choke opens with a fellow-addict named Nico astride him on the ladies room floor at the church where the pair should be attending this week's group-therapy session.
Where it heads from there might best be captured by the awful phrase, equal parts sinister and banal, that Victor deadpans with special relish: "For serious." As in: for serious, the preserved foreskin of Jesus Christ is a pivotal plot element. Yet even that non-sequitur fails to send Choke crashing into farce; the emotional integrity of the book holds. This is a sign of Chuck Palahniuk's maturation. Thematically, Choke is as monomaniacal as his iconic Fight Club, igniting and reigniting the same existential powder-keg between the male body — evolved for fighting and fornicating, hunting animals and making things — and a present that's disembodied, softened, mediated. (It's no accident that Victor works a service-industry job imitating the productive work of centuries past.) But where that earlier novel conflated the universal with the generic — its nameless narrator was a cipher for all post-industrial manhood — Choke displays the confidence of specificity. Victor Mancini's peculiarities, his impulses, his life and thought patterns, are nothing like yours or mine; it's the sting of surprise, not the balm of recognition, that makes descending to his particular reality worth the vertigo.
Write a Review 0 Member Reviews
Chuck=worst narrator ever.
I love this book. I have read every Chuck Palahniuk book and I consider this his best. That being said, the reading of this audio book is horrible, and its read by the author! I thought "one of my favorite authors reading his best work, whats not to like?" how wrong I was. His voice is so bad, and his pacing and tone are unbareable. I couldnt even make it past chaper two. Don't waste your time/downloads on this.
A strong book
This is a powerful book, well-written, and of course brilliantly narrated. It won't be everybody's cup of tea, and is not for the sqeamish. If you're looking for something completely different, persevere with this.
Beautiful Train Wreck
You won't be able to tell your friends about this book. You'll feel dirty just listening. And in the end it will be one of your favorites ever. Palahniuk's brilliance is his ability to wrap subtlety inside of blinding excess. He's like a guy who punches you in the face to disguise the fact that he's putting $100 in your pocket.
Relentlessly depressing but sympathetic
I found after listening to a good couple of hours of this book that I was depressed with a massive headache. I had loved Fight Club and hoped for more from Palhniuk, and initially I was pleased by his sympathetic and compassionate step into the shoes of the mentally ill compulsive but it just hit me that I don't need to take that trip because I've been there myself. If you are curious about the way compulsives think or have a friend who is in that state and you want to understand them this book might help, but really just read an article in a science magazine. It will alarm you less. Couldn't finish it.
A roll in the gutter.
I slogged through this tedious, ugly story hoping that there would be, as I found at the end of Fight Club, some redemption in it; --some payoff at the end that would justify the time spent listening to Palahniuk's interminable compendium of abject filth, sordid sick-mindedness, and general depravity. Alas, there was no payoff. It was a journey to nowhere, offering only a vivid view of ugly, trashy scenery along the way. What a waste of time and effort it was to sit through this insipid book. You could accomplish the same effect without spending the money by going out tonight and rolling in a gutter!
Overrated...
Well it's just dull. Reads like half-baked Ian Banks.
I love palahniuk
chuck palahniuk is the fucking greatest its a smart and funny read it ending is beautiful fucking read this and all his other books id start with invisible monsters